Is Patent Law Technology Specific?

نویسندگان

  • Dan L. Burk
  • Mark A. Lemley
چکیده

Fundamental shifts in technology and in the economic landscape are rapidly making the current system of intellectual property rights unworkable and ineffective. Designed more than 100 years ago to meet the simpler needs of an industrial era, it is an undifferentiated, one-sizefits-all system. Although treating all advances in knowledge in the same way may have worked when most patents were granted for new mechanical devices, today’s brainpower industries pose challenges that are far more complex.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

analysis of contract law of commercial expectations in patent license

In this research, protection of commercial expectation has been examined. The main question is how we could identify and assess existence of commercial expectations. In response, commercial expectation are acquisition of expectable benefit in market, mass production, absence of technical failure in licensed knowledge and so on. Therefore, it is essential to response by analysis of contract law ...

متن کامل

Of Patents and Path Dependency : a Comment on Burk and Lemley

This Article delves into issues surrounding the relationship between technology and the patent law. Responding to Dan Burk and Mark Lemley’s earlier article, Is Patent Law Technology-Specific?, the piece notes that the basic question posed by Burk and Lemley’s article is a relatively easy question given the several doctrines that explicitly link the subject matter context of an invention to the...

متن کامل

Patent law--balancing profit maximization and public access to technology.

This article addresses the contemporary issue of balancing the need for patent protection for intellectual property with the resulting restriction of public access to new technology. The author argues that patent law protects private property rights rather than creating monopolies. Additionally, the author discusses how restricting access to patented technology, such as pharmaceuticals, can aff...

متن کامل

Recommended response for human cloning patent applications.

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) should not follow the recent decision of the European Union to invalidate patents pertaining to human cloning technology. First, human cloning inventions are clearly patentable in the United States; not only do these inventions meet the statutory requirements of proper subject matter and utility, but they are also not precluded from satisf...

متن کامل

Patent-Ineligibility as Counteraction

Today, normative debates over restrictions on patent-eligibility are uniformly premised on a discrimination theory of patent-ineligibility: the restrictions are assumed to cause the patent regime as a whole to discriminate against, and thus grant weaker patent protection for, the affected technology. Under discrimination theory, the justification for a rule of patent ineligibility turns on whet...

متن کامل

Facilitating access of AIDS drugs while maintaining strong patent protection.

The AIDS pandemic has thrust the subject of patent protection into the spotlight, a spotlight that has attracted the attention of broad audience including interested parties from the political, legal, and medical communities. Can the United States' scheme of strong patent protection for pharmaceutical products withstand the increased attention?

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره cs.CY/0109107  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001